Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / "Guides" preview

I like the idea. When I saw this feature has been implemented I immediately thought of guides as an opportunity to explain things like Producer-Consumer patterns (in the style of Johan Sundström framework), how to use some complex scripts with lots of options, etc. I was quickly disappointed as I noticed that the very two first guides (besides yours) are
1) for self-promotion of own scripts (even worse: the promoted scripts are targeted at destroying a business model instead of *enhancing the web*, which is, I think, the aim of userscripts) and
2) a hint to a day-to-day javascript syntax construct which is built into the language since there is javascript in the world.

Maybe the original aim of guides should be stressed or somehow monitored in order to avoid that this useful feature quickly turns into a chaotic wiki full of javascript tutorials, personal homepages, etc?
Or maybe I'm misinterpreting the feature and everything is alright, I don't know.

Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / Spam and malware

No, I mean the bountyup.com banner. See the discussion in the Greasemonkey list, and the following screenshots of what I'm seeing in Firefox and IE respectively:

http://esquifit.googlepages.com/uso1.jpg
http://esquifit.googlepages.com/uso2.jpg

Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / Spam and malware

There's a funny banner above every script page. I guess this is not intentional. Has us.o been hacked?